28 September 2009

Red Beard

Akira Kurosawa’s last black and white film, Red Beard, follows a storyline similar to Bernard Émond’s La Donation. The themes are similar, although the Japanese work develops more slowly and is more lyrical. A doctor with aspirations of serving Japan’s royal court is sent to a small clinic in a poor village. Unlike Dr. Dion, who chose to accept a one month posting in Normétal, Dr. Yasumoto is tricked into reporting to the iconic Dr. Niide (a.k.a. “Red Beard”) and initially refuses the position. Over time, he comes to respect Red Beard, his pragmatic viewpoint, and his effective manner of dealing with patients.

The deliberate camera work is patient and affords many opportunities for symbolism. The backdrop for the opening credits is the rooftops of the clinic and the town, showing how society looks down on the poor. Kurosawa often lights the scene so the shadows of the doctors, nurses, and patients are visible. It’s as if their physical bodies are complemented by their spiritual souls. As he does in all of his films, the weather represents when the plot becomes complicated in addition to the conflict inside Dr. Yamoto. Snow falls to show when his conscience is clear.

Everyone in the film comes from a different background, some with skeletons - literally - in the closet. Everyone has a second chance to redeem themselves. Life may not be fair but one can only carry on and do their best. Red Beard’s devotion to the citizens of the small town convinces Dr. Yamoto to change his career path; although he understands that he will have no money and no honour, he still wishes to serve the poor. Seeing the progress of the ill patients inspires him to help more.

To me, the most memorable moment is when the doctors make a house call to a girls with syphilis. The family and neighbours refuse to send her to the clinic. Red Beard bluntly tells them: “A bad doctor can kill you. I won’t kill you but I will break some arms and legs.” The men subsequently step outside and the doctor gives the intransigent strangers a thorough beating to straighten them out. Then he orders his two interns to bandage the injured and find a cart to carry the seriously wounded to the clinic. “I might have gone too far,” Red Beard reflects.

The film develops characters slowly and consistently. There are comedic moments, emotional scenes, and even though it is not The Seven Samurai, a clever action sequence.  Similar to how Torn Curtain was the end of an amazing filmmaking partnership (Hitchcock and Hermann), Red Beard is the last time that Kurosawa worked with Toshirô Mifune. Mifune played so many iconic roles (the businessman, the beggar, the bandit) yet he always altered his performance so that he was not merely portraying an archetype. In this film, he could have made Red Beard the stereotypical mentor but his gruff but sensitive mannerism and steely eyes (Christian Bale could learn from this) shaped a truly memorable character.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

18 September 2009

T.I.F.F. 2009, Part IV: Face

Face (also known as Visage for the French translation) would have significantly benefited from a Q & A session, which was cancelled because the director could not make it to Toronto. Speaking to him would have answered the two meaningful questions in the minds of audience members: “What just happened?” and “Did they ever recapture that escaped stag?” This film should not have been selected for the festival and should not have been green lit by a studio for numerous reasons.

Firstly, the film wastes excellent cinematography. Close shots where characters were reflected in mirrors or windows, long fixed shots that showed a character moving down the stairs or through a hallway, and shots that showed a character questioning themselves as the world, for example a highway interchange or the traffic along le Jardin des Tuileries, carries on around them. These camera angles were visually stunning and wasted in a film that will not get significant distribution anywhere.

Secondly, the director hammers the audience over the head with overt symbolism. Characters duct tape mirrors, chant rhymically in a cemetery, and share a bizarre love scene in a meat locker. The first scene depicts a failed meeting with the director and his producer in a coffee shop. They never connect, just as the film never connects with its goal to explore how one discovers their own identity.

There is also an attempt to break down the fourth wall and make Face self-referential. The main character is a Taiwanese director attempting to make a film in Paris. I think that this proved to be a distraction from the main themes of the film.

Lastly, the screenplay is poor. Some images are absurd, such as a kitchen sink accident reminiscent of the Welch House Flood of ’99 or opera characters whose opulent costumes cannot fit in the tight spaces of the real world. I think that the point is that we are always struggling through life, trying to find ourselves. People may handle obstacles differently, perhaps by trying to hide or attempting to deny the truth, but they musts move forward regardless. In the end, humanity is driven by the passions that provide the most significant moments in life.

But I really have no idea. Maybe the director simply wanted to tell the world that canned tomatoes and plastic wrap are not used nearly enough as sexual devices. 0

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

13 September 2009

T.I.F.F. 2009, Part I: Les Herbes Folles

Les Herbes Folles is an odd film. The first part of the film is replete with deadpan humour and bizarre situations. The second half of the film channels a bit of Pierrot le Fou and tries to leave the audience guessing. Director Alain Resnais leaves the audience guessing, providing a Hollywood ending followed by the “real” ending five minutes later. Two random strangers are connected by a lost wallet and become infatuated with each other. There is a sense that Georges, who found the wallet, is hiding something but it is never totally revealed, only suggested. Marguerite initially wants nothing to do with him but later cannot keep Georges out her mind.

Non-sequiturs jar the audience concentration throughout the film and there is frequent use of symbolism. A broken fly along with an out of control plane, a man repainting his house as he tries to renovate himself. Some moments are absurd, like a party in the police station keeping officers from their duties or a dentist wilfully causing patients pain. The world is a random, crazy place.

The audience plays the role of observer, due to overhead shots or shots filming people from behind. The camera pans from one corner of the room to another and it is obvious several minutes have elapsed. The narrator shows the thoughts of the characters, their doubts, and second thoughts, instead of being an all-knowing voice. I think that these directorial strategies were instrumental in grabbing the attention of the audience and helping them relate to the characters. **½

Labels: , , , , , ,

29 July 2009

Rashomon

What more can I say about Akira Kurosawa that I haven’t already discussed? Rashomon was another innovative masterpiece, building on the themes of his other works, like High and Low and The Seven Samurai. I was mildly astonished that I didn’t have any Kurosawa DVDs on my shelves when I got home. I was sure that I had purchased The Seven Samurai some time ago.

A body is discovered in the woods and three people - the accused, the victim’s wife, and the spirit of the dead man via a medium - recount different stories about what happen. The three tales may all be lies or they each might contain some element of the truth. A witness and a priest struggle to explain what happened to a bystander as they all seek shelter from a driving rainstorm.

Would it be a Kurosawa film if it weren’t in black and white? Nobody is entirely good or evil and everyone’s morals are drawn in shades of grey. The film remains tense although characters are merely retelling a story that occurred three days previously and the script combines action and comedy. Kurosawa balances tight closeups to show the emotions of each character with wide angle shots to convey the entire scene. The audience was entertained throughout the screening at the Bloor Cinema.

The priest is tremendously dismayed at what appears to be a failed marriage, a senseless rape, and a vicious murder. He is having trouble reconciling his studies with human nature. In feudal Japan, during desperate times, people stoop to contemptible levels. Regular citizens may condemn the bandits who torment them but they are willing to steal from each other in order to survive.

Nevertheless, while every soul has the capacity for evil, everyone can redeem themselves with their actions. The witness who had lied about the murder and stolen from the crime scene convinces the priest with a selfless act, depicted subtly by the director, at the conclusion of the film.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

19 May 2009

Sin Nombre

What separates Sin Nombre from other films is the same quality that prevents the film from becoming great: the use of symbolism. The film is replete with metaphors. Twin storylines which become intertwined when Hondurans attempting to illegally immigrate to the United States become entangled with members of a Mexican crime family.

The refugees travel by train through Mexico, surreptiously dodging deportation by the border police as they move northwards. Some Mexicans welcome them and provide assistance, tossing fruits to the migrants; others curse them and throw stones. A family - a father, his brother, and his daughter - strive to reunite with family in New Jersey and as it is with real life, not everyone reaches their goal.

Religious icons illustrate the story of the two members of the Mara Salvatrucha as they follow parallel paths to Heaven and Hell. Casper has become disillusioned with his illegal lifestyle and chooses to leave the gang and leave the county. Smiley is a youth who wishes to become initiated into the gang and is willing to kill Casper to prove it.

Although they may be involved in regular gun fights and seek to kill their rivals, the Mara adorn themselves with tattoos of crosses and rosary beads. Likewise, the passengers on the train pray that they will reach their destination.

Smiley begins the film living with his grandmother who curses Casper and the rest of the gang and can only receive his M.S. tattoo by catching his former “homie” and killing him. Casper has recorded images from his life on a digital camera, which he has kept to himself and reviews occasionally. He must give it up to pay for his river crossing into Texas.

After killing the boss and leaving the gang, Casper catches a train with the Honduran family. He meets Sayra and tells her about an airplane plant he saw when he once organized a human smuggling expedition and how he wanted to climb the giant globe in front of the factory. When she survives and crosses the border, I thought that she should have tried to find the globe and climb it for Casper, since the film is largely based on symbolism. She calls her family instead, recalling an earlier scene where her father forces her to memorize the telephone number. But in a sense, Casper didn’t complete his journey to reconciliation because literally falls a few feet short of his goal.

Tension is successfully by putting the characters in jeopardy via a variety of situations throughout the film. The actors do their job but none of the portrayals are spectacular. Like Gomorrah, Sin Nombre shows how crime has become insidious across the globe and how many indigent people see felonies as the escape from poverty.

Labels: , , , , ,

14 April 2009

Hungry for More

Hunger - a film recreation of the hunger strike by I.R.A. leader, British M.P., and inmate of the Maze Prison in Belfast Bobby Sands - is mostly very good. It is a gritty recreation of the “Troubles” between the United Kingdom and Irish Republicans. The cast successfully portrays the intense emotions of Irish prisoners on a “blanket and no-wash” protest because they are seeking political status. When Sands and other inmates seek to up the ante with a hunger strike, the actors give the audience a real sense of the determination required to sacrifice oneself for a cause.

However, major flaws abound.

Firstly, the lead character is not sympathetic at all. As the audience watches Sands deteriorate and suffer extraordinarily painful symptoms, he merits no compassion. He is reprehensible and completely disregards the lives of others and their families. There is no reason that anyone but one of his compatriots would wish for him to survive or hope that he proves his point.

The protagonist orders the murder of prison guards and encourages other inmates to end their lives by joining his strike. Sands is not a tragic hero who recognizes his mistakes and regrets the path he has chosen. He is simply a callous and self-centered ideologue who is so consumed by the righteousness of his cause that he is hyperopic to those around him, like Pádraic Delaney in The Wind that Shakes the Barley as he executes his own brother for the sake of the new Irish Free State.

Secondly, the symbolism of the film is inconsistent. Early in the film, the director Steve McQueen focuses on the hands: the bloodied and bruised hands of a guard, the feces encrusted hands of a protesting prisoner, and the gloved hands of the cleaning staff. This is meaningful because the hands are the tools of the characters, like the characters are the tools of the British and Irish sides. That is, until the idea is abandoned midway through the film.

The film begins by profiling the daily minutiae of a guard’s life. I’m not sure what to make of him; he doesn’t seem to enjoy his job and has become desensitized by all the violence required. Sands is shown with his family members and discussing his ideals with the prison pastor and this helps clarify his character. There is a half-hearted attempt to show parallels between the good and the evil (although this is from an entirely relative point of view) but it is not coherent throughout the film.

I’m not sure what the message is of the film. Considering the mindless violence of the Troubles and the two thousand civilians killed, nobody is sympathetic. Perhaps, as Andy Dufresne said in another prison drama, The Shawshank Redemption, it’s “Get busy living or get busy dying.”

Labels: , , , , , , ,

26 March 2009

Gomorrah

This Italian film with English subtitles relies on the contrast between innocent youth and the guilty actions of the members of the Camorra crime syndicate in the region of Campania to make its dramatic point. The insidious organization, supposedly larger than the Cosa Nostra, recruits young people to fill its ranks, which deplete rapidly due to an enormous number of homicides. Two teenaged friends realize that they must become mortal enemies because one of them joined a separatist faction. Two dim-witted young men go from playing Scarface to stealing weapons. A grocery delivery boy uses his position to trick a woman to open her door so she can be killed.

Symbolism is frequent throughout the film. After gunfire erupts on the highway, a car of a rival organization crashes into a cemetery filled with angelic sculptures. The film in a microcosm is symbolized by a wide-angle shot from an apartment complex where children play in a kiddie pool on one level while Camorra members search for someone on the roof.

The film follows different storylines that illustrate different aspects of the Camorra: a designer of counterfeit clothing, the elderly paymaster, a developer dumping toxic waste in a quarry, and more. To a degree, the film lacks both a beginning and an ending but it illustrates tragically how the group constantly pervades life (and death) in Campania.

Labels: , , , , , ,

28 July 2008

Chambord: François I’s Hunting Lodge and Home

In 1513, a wild boar entered the chateau in Ambois and raced through its halls. Lords and ladies were terrified as the beast charged towards them. The only person in the Royal Court who could stop the four-legged marauder was the Dauphin, François. The future king slew the animal with his sword, exhibiting his hunting prowess and gallantry.

When he became King of France in 1515, François I remained an avid hunter. Following his campaigns in Italy, he ordered the construction of a new chateau in Chambord to serve as a royal hunting lodge. Not only did François I seek to defeat Charles V on the battlefield but he wanted to surpass the Holy Roman Emperor in terms of fashion and sophistication. Chambord was his attempt to become the “greatest builder of his time” (McConnachie 154). Construction began in 1519 and was eventually completed in 1547.

Like the limestone blocks used to build the castle walls, some of the Chambord’s distinctive features have worn away but its origin is still clear. Build to be a hunting lodge that befits a king, it was also a home and safe haven for François I. From afar or up close, inside or outside, symbols of the hunt appear. Material and symbolic clues are found in the castle’s architecture, emblems throughout the property, and pieces of art.

The size and surroundings of François I’s permanent residence in Blois precluded him from hunting as much as he would have liked. The chateau in Blois was too small to lodge the large number of people involved in the hunt and the hilly environment was not fruitful for game. Twenty kilometres to the East on the Rivière Cosson, the enormous Chambord estate was designed to be the complete opposite (Hélène).

Measuring 156 metres in length and 56 in height, Chambord holds 426 rooms. A 5,440 hectare park was enclosed by a thirty-two kilometre wall. In the past, two thousand people would stay there (in the chateau or camping on the grounds). To the thousands of tourists who visit today, it is immediately apparent that this is not a typical property.

François I took an integral role in the design of the property. He selected a site near the old Park of Chambord, which had become a ruin but was a favourite hunting spot when he was younger (Buzon 4). The location also boasted a large number of stags in the vicinity (Saussaye 53). Besides deer, the marshy surroundings suited wild game that the king enjoyed to hunt, like wild boars, wolves, and 120 types of birds. The king required a hunting party of four hundred people, who could only be accommodated on the vast grounds of Chambord (Hélène).

The architecture belies another subtle signal that this was meant to be a hunting lodge: the facility is not suitable for year-round occupation. The immense rooms - some almost four metres in height - are extremely difficult to heat. François I and the Royal Court travelled from castle to castle with all of his furniture and belongings. Since there are no villages near Chambord, any food would have to be brought in the royal caravan or hunted, making long stays impractical.

When designing Chambord, François I wanted the chateau to be comfortable for everyone. At the time he said that “a royal court without ladies is like a year without spring and spring without roses” (Fabri 36). As he result, ornate rooftop terraces and belvederes were included in the facility. Nevertheless, there are no pleasure gardens or outdoor features such as the fountains and pergolas found at Villandry. The chateau is huge but the rooms within are small and it lacks the rooms and facilities for a royal ball or banquet. Chambord is more of a lodge than a palace, displaying a cottage aesthetic, exemplified by the exposed half-timbering seen in the walls of the upper stories.

There are hundreds of symbols of all sizes throughout Chambord, representing François I or hunting. Over seven hundred salamanders inhabit the in the castle. The arched ceiling outside the king’s quarters is a checkerboard of “F” and salamanders. The cross-shaped floorplan of the centre tower was part of the king’s personal influence on the project. Vaulted halls intersecting in a cross design were popular during Antiquity but had not been used in modern times until Donato Bramante included the idea his blueprints for Saint Peter’s Cathedral in Rome (Fabri 32). The social and structural focal point of Chambord harkened back to classical buildings like the Pantheon and remained current with Renaissance trends.

The wooden doors are carved with a salamander on top and flames below. The flourishes in Chambord’s capitals and entablatures call to mind elements of flamboyant Italian architecture at the time. During the erection of the chateau, François I had been captured at the Battle of Pavia and held prisoner by Charles V. Observers believe that the elaborate rooftop city built on top of the castle was inspired by the Charterhouse of Pavia (McConnachie 155).

The emblems of the chateau were a stag and a boar; today the tourism office logo is a salamander and a stag. The stag and the boar were chosen because of their abundance outside the castle walls where they number seven hundred and twelve hundred respectively in the flesh. Consequently, the animals were frequently hunted and their prominence in Chambord’s architecture is an emblem for François I’s love of the sport. At the time that Chambord was built, the stag and the boar had been portrayed in art for centuries and possessed their own symbolic meanings.

The winged stag was formerly the emblem of the French royal family until Louis XII adopted the porcupine. It is also a Christian allegory because of the way a herd of deer help each other in the wild and the manner in which it renews its horns each spring. Other symbolic characteristics of the animal are pride and purification.

According to mythology, stags would hunt snakes, drawing the creature out of its hole and trampling it. If the stag were bitten by the serpent or ate their prey alive, they could purify themselves by drinking water. Venison was sought in the 1500s because it was believed that the meat had medicinal properties (Badke “Stag”). Antlers of the deer that were killed in the hunt were often exhibited on the walls of the castle. Today, dozens of trophies are displayed in the Musée de la Chasse.

The wild boar was often hunted by nobility in the sixteenth century as a way to demonstrate courage and athletic skill (Colson 1266). The ferocity of the animal symbolizes courageous and strong warriors (Decker “Animal Symbolism”), in addition to recalling François I’s exploit in Amboise. When a boar was cornered by a hunting party, it was customary for the lord to dismount his horse and kill the animal with his dagger.

These symbols are incorporated in the detailed decorations of Chambord, along with many other animals. The downspouts - now a common item but richly embellished in Renaissance castles like Blois (Figure A) - shaped like stags (Figure B). The cornice is engraved with nature scenes and a variety of wild beasts (Figure C).

Meticulous tapestries hung throughout the chateau serve two purposes. The fabric insulates the stone walls and conserves heat generated from the many fireplaces. In order to embody style and status, some of the apartments are covered in fine silk embroidering and others with ornate tapestries crafted by a skilled artisan. At Chambord, tapestries usually feature scenes of hunting or nature.

One of the tapestry sets in Chambord was called “The Story of the Hunting Expeditions of King François I.” One scene shows the king hunting with the Royal Court. Despite foraying into the woods, François is lavishly attired in god britches. He is looking at the viewer confidently, pointing a staff to direct his party. On the left side, some men prepare horses to be mounted. On the right, a group of hounds are on the scent of prey and in the background a gloved falconer is readying his charges. The faces in the border could represent a hunting god or goddess, like Diana (Figure D).

Another work on the ground floor shows the king on horseback, leading his party. François I is riding forward fearlessly, followed by his group with hounds and birds. On the opposite wall, a lord and lady examine the birds that they have trapped in the woods near Chambord. In a different scene, courteliers are watching hounds chase a flock of fowl into a stream (Figure E). These scenes are a stark contrast to other royal accommodations where the artwork showcases portraits of the king and his predecessors, like the Louis XIV apartments at Chambord (Figure F).

“The Wolf Hunt” hangs in the Flemish Room, showing a large hunting party pursuing a wolf with hounds. They have trapped their quarry and the leader is about to dismount his horse and deliver a killing blow with his spear. Others are armed with different weapons symbolic of the hunt. It is an allegory for humans working together and overcoming the temptation of sin (Badke “The Wolf”), like farmers collaborating to save their flocks from a wolf. Nature’s bounty is plentiful; trees bear scores of oranges and the tapestry is bordered by oranges, grapes, and flowers (Figure G).

The king was only able to spend seventy-two days at Chambord during his thirty-two year reign and did not see its completion. At the time of his death, only the royal apartments had been finished (Buzon 8). Though he was not involved, events that preceded and followed his reign have interlocked seamlessly with his symbols and added to the heritage of Chambord.

Chambord was built on the site of an old-hunting lodge that had been used by the Dukes of Orleans for centuries. Local legend says that the forest is haunted by “Black Hunter” during autumn nights. The ghostly Thibault of Champagne, clad only in black - along with black dogs and black-haired companions - chases his prey between Bury and Monsfrault all night. It was said that Thibault’s howls could be heard by farmers and residents of Chambord (Saussaye 43).

Two seventeenth-century tapestries hang in the Musée but they would have fit perfectly in François I’s décor. As classical myths became more popular during the Renaissance, he would have appreciated the “The Story of Meleager and the Wild Boar Hunt” (Figure G) and a depiction of Diana, the Roman goddess of the hunt.

As told by Ovid, Meleager, met his demise while hunting a legendary boar with his uncles and a woman named Atalanta. When the hunt concluded, Meleager awarded the head and tusks to Atalanta because her spear had drawn first blood. His uncles objected and Meleager killed them. Afterwards, his mother throws the log that signifies Meleager’s lifespan into the fire, killing her son (Ovid VIII 250-456).

The myth is an image of hunting but it also an allegory for the four seasons. The Calydonian boar, arriving in the spring and fall, destroyed farmers’ crops. When the weather was cold, farmers were at risk that a late frost might kill newly planted crops in the spring and early snow or hail that would do likewise before the harvest in the fall. The heat of the summer sun allows crops to thrive, like those shown on the border of the tapestry. Meleager’s death mirrors the limited length of the summer and the interaction between light and dark, summer and winter, and day and night (Hooker).

Some of these elements can be seen in the symmetrical layout of Chambord. There are four turrets on the centre tower, which is divided into four quarters. Outside, slate diamonds indicate symbols, such as the four seasons and the four elements. When balanced with circles and ellipses Figure H, the shapes show the balance of the king’s temporal power on Earth and the heavenly power of God (Hélène). The spiral staircase and other features make the chateau a blend of Medieval and Renaissance architecture (Buzon 11).

François I ultimately succeeded in matching his Italian rival. When Charles V first visited in 1535, he remarked that Chambord was a testament to what could be accomplished by the human spirit (Saussaye 19). Now, it is a national symbol of France, internationally known for its architecture.

Finally, the strongest symbols of how Chambord was the king’s hunting lodge are stories retelling how François I referred to the chateau. When announcing a trip to the estate, the sovereign would tell his court “let’s go home.” There are many associations with the word home - such as safety, comfort, family, enjoyment - which François wanted to recall by using those words. To him, it was a place where he could truly relax and indulge his favourite hobby.

Bibliography:

Badke, David. The Medieval Bestiary. David Badke. 27 July 2008 .
Buzon, Christine de. Le Château de Chambord. Florence: Bonechi, 2008.
Colson, Gregory M. “Sport, War, and Contest in Shakespeare’s Henry VI.” Renaissance Quarterly. 54.4 (Winter 2001): p. 1251-1272.
Decker, Judy and Vivian Komando. Animal Symbolism. Princeton Online. 27 July 2008 .
Fabri, Patrizia, Simonetta Giorgi, et al. Châteaux de Loire. Paris: Bonechi, 1995.
Hooker, John and Carin Perron. “The Role of the Boar.” Coriosolite Expert System. 27 July 2008 .
Hélène. Guided Tour. “Chambord.” Le Château de Chambord, Chambord, 23 July 2008.
Kline, Anthony K., Ed. Poetry in Translation. 14 July 2008. .
McConnachie, James and Hugh Clearly. The Rough Guide to the Loire. New York: Penguin Group, 2007.
Saussaye, L. de la. Le Chateau de Chambord 8ième ed. Lyon: Imprimerie de Louis Perrin, 1859.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

21 July 2008

Deux films

Two films that I watched over the weekend had similar themes. La Nouvelle vie de Monsieur Horten, Norwegian with French subtitles (a past Cannes selection and a future TIFF selection), and Nos 18 ans were good films, developed smoothly (and promptly), and talked about how to set priorities and enjoy life.

La Nouvelle vie de M. Horten, was an intelligent version of The Bucket List. It is a quiet film with moments of absurd humour. Odd Horten is a train conducteur who is forced to retire and doesn’t know what to do with himself. Single and living near the train tracks, Horten had lived a life focused on his job. He has several regrets, such as his fear of ski jumping and a sporadic relationship with an innkeeper on his train route.

Still wearing his railway uniform as he begins his retirement, Horten encounters characters in various stages of their lives. One of the characters, later revealed to be a schizophrenic, tells him that “it’s never too late in life” to do anything.

The film benefited from several subtle performances and an airy soundtrack that suited the film perfectly. On the other hand, the director Bent Hamer used such obvious symbolism it was as if he was breaking rocks with a sledge hammer. It’s very good but moments like when Horten observes the neighbourhood bakery making a wedding cake were like a Dummies Guide to the film.

Nos 18 ans tells the tale of a group of friends who have graduated from high school and must write their Baccalaureate examination. One character Lucas, took the trouble to tell-off his least favourite teacher (Prof. Martineau) before he left school, only to find out that that the teacher would be his examiner for the “bac” and happened to be the father of the girl that he was in love with.

Throughout the film, the friends balance celebrating their graduation with studying for the “bac” and realize how the test is not the alpha and the omega in life. As he tutors Lucas, Prof. Martineau realizes that he has missed some opportunities in life and decides to change his philosophy somewhat. Lucas and his peers all head of in different directions and must realize that they are now adults and fully responsible for their actions.

The film was humourous but also dealt with serious issues. It focused on how young people chose their path in life and how they live with it afterwards. Some of the performances were less than average; it seemed that aside from Prof. Martineau and his ex-wife, there were only two types of characters in the film, depending on the sex of the performer. The ending seemed thrown together as a more detailed conclusion would have wrapped up the film better.

Both films emphasize that work and school aren’t always paramount; it’s paramount to remember Orbital’s philosophy regarding regret. Ski jumping, that extra mille-feuille, the visiting Place de Grand Marché on a whim, an extra folly. Putting friends first and developing a support group. Carpe Diem (encore).

Labels: , , , , , , ,